Digital BW, The Print

On Thursday, August 19, 2004, at 08:16 PM, Josh Freeman wrote:

> Well, if they were made using a pigmented ink printer, such as one
> that uses ultrachrome or piezography, they could be called Pigment
> Prints.
>
> That term seems to be pretty accepted. The Museum of Photographic Arts
> here in San Diego has an exhibition right now by Robert Weingarten and
> all of the prints are labled as pigment prints. They were printed
> using a 9600 on one of the textured papers, not sure which right now
> though. It doesn't have the "stigma" of digital print or the history
> of giclee.

Hi, Josh

I lived in San Diego for many years, and studied photography at 
Grossmont with Suda House, and learned a lot from Jim Noel, David Wing 
and Gene Nocon- went to about a year's worth of his Final Friday 
workshops.  I left in '93, too early for MOPA to have considered inkjet 
prints, but I'm very pleased to learn that now that inkjet prints are 
as good as they are, that MOPA is showing them, as I think galleries 
today should.

James Irelan


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]