Steve, Only your eyes can answer this question. I have the Epson 4870 flatbed and a Minolta 5400 for 35mm. The scans of 35mm Velvia on the 5400 knock even some 6x9 scans on the 4870 into a cocked hat in my view. I use a scanning suite and pay $60 an hour to scan my MF on a Flextight 848. The difference between that and a scanner I can afford at home is astronmical. But in my view at 8x10 you can easily get great results from any of these methods. That is a fairly undemanding size. I think you would still be able to tell a difference if you were picky... but that is the variable only you control. > consider that reasonably priced.) I would want to print 8X10 and I > suspect that a 20mg scan would do that -- although I may be off here. > > Thanks, > > Steve
Message
Re: MF Scans
2004-08-21 by architekphoto
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.