Digital BW, The Print

Tyler

When you said "I'm hoping the list remains as open as Martin intended." to
my ears it sounds like it's not as open as Martin intended. I have no idea
why you would put that sentiment in a post responding to my words. If there
is some great Oz pulling strings on this list I'd like to know about it as
much as anybody.

I was sensing some grudge from you ("duke it out" were your words) and took
it personally. If you do begrudge something/someone please just spell it
out, otherwise it looms large and mysterious, and casts doubt on the
integrity of the list at large, and I think it's unfair to the innocent.

Peace,
Todd

>> COM's Tyler, that's not fair! I'm tired of this innuendo. You say you don't
>> want to duke it out, but then go on to imply my opinion is tainted.
> 
> Good Lord Todd, what on earth must be wrong with the way I state things? I
> implied I'm not engaging in certain debates
> anymore with certain people, but I sure didn't think you and I were duking it
> out just then, nor was there any innuendo, nor
> did I imply your opinion was tainted.
> 
> snip...
>> You seemed to be asking why Spectratones doesn't get a lot of attention, so
>> people answered that. It's not always a big conspiracy.
> 
> I'll be damned if I can figure out how I might have implied I think it is.
> So here I am again, attempting to sort out what appears to be yet another
> misunderstanding surrounding my posts. This is
> clearly not fun, and other than some way OT threads about art, I'm having
> trouble remembering the last time it was. So
> Todd, can you tell me why I keep coming back, or should continue to? Who needs
> this? You don't, I don't.
> Tyler