Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Arches Infinity

2004-08-28 by Tyler Boley

I agree with Steve. Disapointing Dmax, bad gloss differencial in
shadows, tendency to mottle with high ink load, severely overpriced.
Did I mention it smells bad?

Other than that, it's beautiful!
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, sdmey4@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 8/28/2004 8:22:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
> deanwork2003@y... writes:
> 
> > Is anyone using Arches Infinity out there? Is there any reason to
consider 
> > it over 
> > Hahnemuhle rag varieties? It seem quite a bit more expensive. I
tried a 
> > couple of sheets of 
> > the textured version and it is nice but didn't show me any
improved d-max or 
> > tonal 
> > characteristics over what I have been using that I could see. Why
is so much 
> > more 
> > expensive? The name?
> > 
> > john
> > 
> John, I hade to rule infinity  out also with Piezotones as the dmax
just 
> wasn't there.
> Beautiful paper though and well suited for color work and some BW
stuff. 
> Ultrachrome Black not that hot either on this paper compared the
Hahnemule.
> 3-4 times the price of Silver fiber paper!  I'll pass for now. 
> Steve M.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.