> > The act of creation without an audience is an act of > > self-gratification. > > The act of creation without an audience is an act of self-expression. An expression to whom, or what? To oneself (which is what I'm calling an act of self- gratification)? An imposition of will over materials (which gets druidic)? In my mind, art requires communication, and communication is a transmission of something not previously realised, connections not made before. In this sense, it is possible to communicate with oneself, but I still find this a self absorption. > > The great beauty of art is > > that it can impregnate long after the creator is dead. > > The creation of works for our legacy is where the self-gratification > comes into play. ;-) That could be an act of self-gratification, but the creator would require the prescience to know that the works will both survive, and be seen. aside: Is this discussion taking place on this list rather than the Fine Art Photo list because of a perceived larger audience here?-- Tim Spragens http://www.borderless-photos.com & http://www.borderless-photos.de
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: ART and LIFE
2001-10-27 by Tim Spragens
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.