Hi Tyler, I like that discovery. It may explain differences between drivers. If you have a densitometer (I guess the EyeOne\ could double as one) and can read some numbers to compare to my chart, we can get to some scientifically valid data (!). As a reminder : my numbers were the result of reading the darkest patch anywhere along an UNlinearized BO scale. Glad you and Ernst are testing and contesting <G>. Antonis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@t...> wrote: > Ernst and Antonis- > I think dot size is an issue. I just did a quick experiment on some > uncoated Somerset scaps. In StudioPrint a user option is dot size. > I've always used the smallest out of habit. I selected one of the > variable options instead and did a quick test. I believe the variable > options open up to the larger dot sizes at the highest densities. By > making that change I got an increase in dmax in all channels with no > apparent increase in dotiness in lower densities. > I need to test it further, but this may explain the differences > between printer models and other mysterys. > Also may be worthwhile with various drivers or RIPs, how they address > the hardware with regard to this. > Tyler
Message
Ink laydown was Re: dMax... some surprises
2004-09-01 by Antonis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.