Jack, I don't know how long you've played around with these printing methods, but the right profile is really key to succesful bw printing. The big advantage of QTR, IJC/OPM and StudioPrint is that they all offer ways for the end user to make or tweak a profile to suit their personal preference or equipment. With IP and others, you have to depend on the company to calibrate the system for you. In fact, with that in mind, IP offers to make you a custom profile if you send them a printed target (for inksets they support). That takes the work out of your hands but in turn means that you can't tweak things on the fly. In order to compare RIPs then, you have to make sure that each is running profiles calibrated and linearized to your particular system. It's for you to choose if you like to do the profiling or have someone else at a distant location handle it. Depending on that choice, you go with the appropriate RIP. All these RIPs can be made to print nearly identical prints. Their differences are far more subtle than your print comparisons suggest. My recommendation is to go with printing software that not only allows you to make your own profiles, but makes the process fast and fool-proof. Beyond that, you'll need a good understanding of color management in general, just to make things match across the whole workflow. Antonis
Message
IP vs QTR vs any RIP [was Re: Quadtone Rip]
2004-09-11 by Antonis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.