Jules, >Good and appreciated discussion about spraying the image side of the >print but . . is it wise to seal the back also? >Not with the dmax enhancing techniques of course but to stop >absorption of other nasties like moisture, lignin and whatnot? The answer to this is likely to depend on the paper and probably other factors. For papers like Epson Enhanced Matte that have acids in them, the more they can breathe the better. Much of the acid will escape into the air. I've read library conservation information that indicates old books with acidic materials in them can deteriorate up to 10 times as fast if they are sealed in a container or encapsulated so that the acids cannot escape. (For framing EEM it's probably best to use highly buffered matte boards.) For cotton papers protecting the image and paper from airborne oxidizers and pollution seems like it could be beneficial. However, I've wondered about the slow evaporation of the non-water components in the inkjet fluids. This is what causes the fogging of glossy prints. With cellulose papers, most of those other substances seem to latch onto the cellulose and just stay there. At any rate, I can imagine that there may be arguments that the paper should be allowed to breathe. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Spraying Ink Prints . .the flip side . .
2004-09-13 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.