Daniel Staver wrote: > If you print a picture with a deep blue sky using UC inks you'll easily > see a shift from purplish blue to cyan if you move from fluorescent to > daylight. This is consistent with the shift you would see with a > "neutral" print printed with the Epson driver. This could indicate that > either the cyan or the magenta inks (or both) are the cause of > metamerism, not yellow. Daniel, The UV content in true daylight will be difficult to cut out with any profiling. The only way then is profiling at 6500K or higher and not using a UV filter in the Spectrometer. Then it will fit the daylight condition but no other environment (and the inks will not last long either in daylight). So a compromise is used with 5500K and the discussion continues whether a UV filter should be used in the Spectrometer and whether it should be in front of the light source (SpectroCam for example) or in front of the sensor. If there's no information of the display conditions then 5500K and no UV filter is the best choice in my opinion. Not mentioning the effects of OBAs in the paper/coating when UV light is around and laminations/varnishes that block the UV light. Problematic metamerism happens already at indoor conditions, I doubt there's an ink that will not metamerise when used outdoors if profiled at 5500K. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Tungsten Balance of Epson Archivals
2004-09-18 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.