Change for change's sake is usually not a beneficial proposition. Why should the US change? So far I have not seen an argument. Why should we not change? Well, there will be a great cost of going through the change. So, if there is no benefit.... -Stephen www.sbillard.org/Stephen > -----Original Message----- > From: jimpatel63 [mailto:jimpatel63@...] > Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 7:52 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: OT - U.S vs. Europe paper sizes??? > > > Americans as a whole are actually very resistant to change. It is a > small minority of leading edge folks that spearheaded the internet > and other technologies here, not the masses. I cannot see many > politicians willing to force a new system down the American public's > throat. e.g. HDTV was stalled for years as Congress required that > any new system also be compatible with NTSC. Luckily, they finally > recanted on that, but look at how slowly HDTV is moving here anyway, > even in the land which has more disposable income than any other. > Those of us in Urban areas don't appreciate how the vast majority of > America lives (in small towns dotted throughout the country). > >
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT - U.S vs. Europe paper sizes???
2004-09-20 by Stephen Billard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.