So what if there is a replacement for the 2200? It'll still work as well as it did before. I'm of the opinion that you do not want to buy a new model printer. I want one of those with developed tried and true workflows so I can make good prints, and do so easily. I don't want to be one of those who spend time on the leading edge trying to learn how to get a new model printer to make prints as good as the previous model that has been figured out already. I watched people spend a year learning how to make a 2200 make prints that look as good as a 1280. And while they are both mature models now, the prints still look the same from both. There appears to be no impending breakthroughs that will cause the 2200 replacement to make any better prints. FWIW, I recently bought a new printer after printing b&w for several years. Did I worry about the 2200 replacement? NO, in fact I didn't even buy a 2200. I bought another 1280 which appears to be at the end of it's life cycle. It prints as good as anything out there but is cheaper, simpler, and I know how to make it work. Epson wants you to believe you must have the lastest and greatest printer. That's good for them. But if you just want to make great prints, and do so easily, buy one of the older models. Bob Michaels --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Dan Koons" <hackberry@s...> wrote: > > Hello, I am new to the list and am looking to get the Epson 2200. The one thing holding me back is wondering if it is due to be replaced. Something introduced over two yrs ago is getting on the "old" side. Any comments here please. Dan > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: epson 2200
2004-10-06 by Bob Michaels
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.