Bonjour Claude, Je vois votre message sur le forum, je suppose que vous etes français, j'utilise aussi l'Epson 4000pro et une 890 que j'ai installé avec les encres Mis UT2. J'attends que QTR sorte pour la 4000 et Windows Xp pour voir si je peux obtenir des résultats N&B corrects avec les UC. Ce serait intéressant de partager nos réactions et impressions sur nos expériences réciproques. Qu'en pensez vous ? Cordialement Michel Braud ----- Original Message ----- From: claudej1@... To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 5:05 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 vs. 2000P If I owned both printers, I would do color with the 2200 and UC inks and do B& W with the new Paul Roark curves and the UT-FS/FSN inks as the best, most efficient use of devices and inksets. Since I got a 4000, it's last call for the 2200 going on Ebay today, unsless I hear from one of you first. $450 plus shipping. The 2000P is slow compared to the 2200, but you can use QImage to batch out printing overnight, so it's really FAST when you are sleeping. You wake up and a bunch of prints are done already. Claude ;>) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 vs. 2000P
2004-10-11 by sinwen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.