Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Film Scanners

2004-10-16 by David B. Brooks

Robert,

Shortly after its announcement I had the opportunity to test and report on
the Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400, which appeared in Shutterbug magazine
some issues back. I also tested and reported on the Canon 4000FS some months
before. I have not reviewed a Nikon scanner for some time, not because I
have any issue with the scanner itself as it is very fine hardware, but
because the software is the worst in its class and the scanner is on that
basis grossly over-priced.

The one outstanding feature, especially applied to scanning B&W silver-based
film is the 5400dpi optical resolution. That is a distinct advantage not
just because it will natively support making 16x24 inch by 300dpi scans, but
the high resolution avoids a pattern interference problem with film grain,
particularly with grainier film processed with acutance developers (low
sodium sulfite formula¹s) like Acufine and particularly Rodinal. In
addition, the Minolta has a Grain Dissolver feature which is actually a very
fine diffusion filter, which combined with the scanners tube light source
that also reduces apparent graininess and avoids highlight blocking, which
can occur with some 35mm dedicated scanners with a more collimated light
source (like the difference printing with a diffusion versus and condenser
enlarger).

If it makes any difference, being an old f... With 3/4 of my film library in
B&W, my reaction after testing the Minolta was to ask for invoice sending
Minolta a check instead of returning the scanner.

Regards, David B. Brooks
Shutterbug Magazine
E-mail: fotografx@...




On 10/15/04 8:07 PM, "Robert" <la_native@...> wrote:

> 
> I'm having the darnest time getting a comprehensive comparison of the
> Nikon LS5000 and the Minolta 5400 compared to my Canon FS4000.  I know
> the newer scanners have lots of new features, faster scanning, better
> bit depth, ICE x 4, etc.
> 
> What I want to know is, do either of these scanners work better with
> B&W negatives, OR pull better shadow detail with slides, than the Canon.
> 
> I already have the Canon and can live with its limitations.  But I'd
> consider upgrading if the image quality were noticeably better.
> 
> All comments w/b appreciated!  Thanks!
> 
> Robert Ades
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership
> without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the
> membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
> Moderators. See “Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines” in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT
> YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE “OWNER” AND
> “MODERATORS” OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU
> FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY
> DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL,
> USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  “OWNER” AND “MODERATORS” OF
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW,
> THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR
> TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE
> DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>  
>  ADVERTISEMENT
>  
> <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=1290hofu6/M=315388.5497957.6576270.3001176/D=grou
> ps/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1097982492/A=2372354/R=0/SIG=12id813k2/*https://www.orc
> hardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40F21004SS>
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
> *  
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub
> scribe> 
> *  
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.