Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Film Scanners

2004-10-16 by Robert

David, thank you for your informative comments.  Given you positive
feelings about the Minolta, is there a noticeable difference compared
to the older Canon fs4000?  Yes, there's an additional 1,400dpi
resolution, but does that provide for better tonality?

With my Canon, the best film for scanning is the b&w chromogenics (TCN
and Xp-2).  Tri-x and most silver-based films don't look so great --
the grain tends to block up and mess with the tone transitions.

-Robert Ades

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "David B. Brooks"
<fotografx@m...> wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> Shortly after its announcement I had the opportunity to test and
report on
> the Minolta Dimage Scan Elite 5400, which appeared in Shutterbug
magazine
> some issues back. I also tested and reported on the Canon 4000FS
some months
> before. I have not reviewed a Nikon scanner for some time, not because I
> have any issue with the scanner itself as it is very fine hardware, but
> because the software is the worst in its class and the scanner is on
that
> basis grossly over-priced.
> 
> The one outstanding feature, especially applied to scanning B&W
silver-based
> film is the 5400dpi optical resolution. That is a distinct advantage not
> just because it will natively support making 16x24 inch by 300dpi
scans, but
> the high resolution avoids a pattern interference problem with film
grain,
> particularly with grainier film processed with acutance developers (low
> sodium sulfite formula¹s) like Acufine and particularly Rodinal. In
> addition, the Minolta has a Grain Dissolver feature which is
actually a very
> fine diffusion filter, which combined with the scanners tube light
source
> that also reduces apparent graininess and avoids highlight blocking,
which
> can occur with some 35mm dedicated scanners with a more collimated light
> source (like the difference printing with a diffusion versus and
condenser
> enlarger).
> 
> If it makes any difference, being an old f... With 3/4 of my film
library in
> B&W, my reaction after testing the Minolta was to ask for invoice
sending
> Minolta a check instead of returning the scanner.
> 
> Regards, David B. Brooks
> Shutterbug Magazine
> E-mail: fotografx@m...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/15/04 8:07 PM, "Robert" <la_native@h...> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I'm having the darnest time getting a comprehensive comparison of the
> > Nikon LS5000 and the Minolta 5400 compared to my Canon FS4000.  I know
> > the newer scanners have lots of new features, faster scanning, better
> > bit depth, ICE x 4, etc.
> > 
> > What I want to know is, do either of these scanners work better with
> > B&W negatives, OR pull better shadow detail with slides, than the
Canon.
> > 
> > I already have the Canon and can live with its limitations.  But I'd
> > consider upgrading if the image quality were noticeably better.
> > 
> > All comments w/b appreciated!  Thanks!
> > 
> > Robert Ades
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership
> > without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
removed from the
> > membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
Owner and
> > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU
> > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
EXEMPLARY
> > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
PROFITS, GOODWILL,
> > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE
DIGITAL BW,
> > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION
OF YOUR
> > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD
PARTY ON THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER
RELATING TO THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >  
> >  ADVERTISEMENT
> >  
> >
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=1290hofu6/M=315388.5497957.6576270.3001176/D=grou
> >
ps/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1097982492/A=2372354/R=0/SIG=12id813k2/*https://www.orc
> > hardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40F21004SS>
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
> > *  
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub
> > scribe> 
> > *  
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.