One more quick comment, I was also able to test ColorVision¹s new Spyder2Pro colorimeter and software, and was very impressed. I've used and tested a few different hardware calibration apps/devices, and this seems very good. Also, I just wanted to add that it's nice to you posting on this list, David. Hope I haven't chased you off. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "David B. Brooks" <fotografx@m...> wrote: > > Bernie, > > May I suggest that ³color management² and monitor calibration and profiling > could at least reduce the discrepancy between what you see on-screen and > what you obtain in a print even though you are working with grayscale and > not color. I have jumped in here in part because I was just delivered > ColorVision¹s new Spyder2Pro colorimeter and software, and the resulting > calibration and profiling I am now obtaining is amazingly well-matched and > the screen gray is at a neutral balance I¹ve not seen before. And may I also > suggest that with an LCD flat panel, its grater brightness range compared to > a CRT, makes it that much more difficult to obtain screen matching in prints > as there is an inherent gamma discrepancy. CRT¹s are much closer in > brightness range and apparent gamma effect to a print density range. > > Regards, David B. Brooks > Shutterbug Magazine > E-mail: fotografx@m... > > > > > On 10/15/04 4:17 AM, "Bernie Ess" <albatros-@...> wrote: > > > > > When I started b&w printing on an Epson, I thought one of the > > advantages over the darkroom was that once its well set up, there > > would be no trying and experimenting and that I would have 100% > > predictable results. > > > > Now, a few hundreds or probably thousands of prints later I find that > > this is > > not exactly the case. On my 2100/UT7 workflow I find the following > > issues: > > > > 1. My output from the file + Roark curves is roughly, but never > > exactly what I see on my monitor. When I look at the grayscale on my > > flat panel the 100% to 0% > > steps are quite well separated, but in the uncorrected print the deep > > shadows (around 95% > > black) are not well resolved, 95% comes out totally > > black: So I had to make a curve that boosts the deep shadows. > > > > 2. I often find myself having to do several prints of the same photo, > > because the general "look" of the print is not like on the screen, see > > also my other message about the foliage and trees. > > > > 3. The most mysterious thing is that my output seems to vary from time > > to time. Sometimes I find the prints too dark compared to the screen, > > sometimes they are slightly too light. > > > > Finally its not that different from the darkroom, I would say > > gradually more predictable (maybe even by a large margin, but that is > > probably because my traditional darkroom skills are so poor). > > > > So, do you have a 100% WYSIWYG workflow? > > > > Thanks for your input, > > > > Bernhard > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > > they are often being updated. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > > them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > > without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > > membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF > > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > > > ADVERTISEMENT > > > > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129jjh7kv/M=315388.5497957.6576270.3001176/D=grou > > ps/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1097925477/A=2372354/R=0/SIG=12id813k2/*https://www.orc > > hardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40F21004SS> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ > > * > > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub > > scribe> > > * > > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] How reliable/ precise is your b&w print workflow?
2004-10-16 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.