Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] How reliable/ precise is your b&w print workflow?

2004-10-16 by Tyler Boley

One more quick comment, I was also able to test ColorVision¹s new
Spyder2Pro colorimeter and software, and was very impressed. I've used
and tested a few different hardware calibration apps/devices, and this
seems very good.
Also, I just wanted to add that it's nice to you posting on this list,
David. Hope I haven't chased you off.
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "David B. Brooks"
<fotografx@m...> wrote:
> 
> Bernie,
> 
> May I suggest that ³color management² and monitor calibration and
profiling
> could at least reduce the discrepancy between what you see on-screen and
> what you obtain in a print even though you are working with
grayscale and
> not color.  I have jumped in here in part because I was just delivered
> ColorVision¹s new Spyder2Pro colorimeter and software, and the resulting
> calibration and profiling I am now obtaining is amazingly
well-matched and
> the screen gray is at a neutral balance I¹ve not seen before. And
may I also
> suggest that with an LCD flat panel, its grater brightness range
compared to
> a CRT, makes it that much more difficult to obtain screen matching
in prints
> as there is an inherent gamma discrepancy. CRT¹s are much closer in
> brightness range and apparent gamma effect to a print density range.
> 
> Regards, David B. Brooks
> Shutterbug Magazine
> E-mail: fotografx@m...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/15/04 4:17 AM, "Bernie Ess" <albatros-@...> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > When I started b&w printing on an Epson, I thought one of the
> > advantages over the darkroom was that once its well set up, there
> > would be no trying and experimenting and that I would have 100%
> > predictable results.
> > 
> > Now, a few hundreds or probably thousands of prints later I find that
> > this is
> > not exactly the case. On my 2100/UT7 workflow I find the following
> > issues:
> > 
> > 1. My output from the file + Roark curves is roughly, but never
> > exactly what I see on my monitor. When I look at the grayscale on my
> > flat panel the 100% to 0%
> > steps are quite well separated, but in the uncorrected print the deep
> > shadows (around 95%
> > black) are not well resolved, 95% comes out totally
> > black: So I had to make a curve that boosts the deep shadows.
> > 
> > 2. I often find myself having to do several prints of the same photo,
> > because the general "look" of the print is not like on the screen, see
> > also my other message about the foliage and trees.
> > 
> > 3. The most mysterious thing is that my output seems to vary from time
> > to time. Sometimes I find the prints too dark compared to the screen,
> > sometimes they are slightly too light.
> > 
> > Finally its not that different from the darkroom, I would say
> > gradually more predictable (maybe even by a large margin, but that is
> > probably because my traditional darkroom skills are so poor).
> > 
> > So, do you have a 100% WYSIWYG workflow?
> > 
> > Thanks for your input,
> > 
> > Bernhard
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other
resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages
to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the
membership
> > without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of
digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be
removed from the
> > membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group
Owner and
> > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files
section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE
PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU
> > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR
EXEMPLARY
> > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF
PROFITS, GOODWILL,
> > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND
"MODERATORS" OF
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
> > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE
DIGITAL BW,
> > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION
OF YOUR
> > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD
PARTY ON THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER
RELATING TO THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >  
> >  ADVERTISEMENT
> >  
> >
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129jjh7kv/M=315388.5497957.6576270.3001176/D=grou
> >
ps/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1097925477/A=2372354/R=0/SIG=12id813k2/*https://www.orc
> > hardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40F21004SS>
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
> > *  
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub
> > scribe> 
> > *  
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.