Tyler, I wrote an article on B&W digital printing that was published in Shutterbug about three years ago, and covered most of the options and products available at that time (including many you listed). Now delving into it again I can understand your point of view with one exception. ³The people that need these things are small in number, and they are the only ones who need it, and they are the ones who can define the need.² is not the reality unless you exclude a lot of serious photography enthusiasts because they are not totally dedicated fine arts¹ photographers. I know my readership is a very small segment of all of the photographic enthusiasts in America, yet I have good evidence I reach an audience in five figures. A very large segment of active photography enthusiasts is middle aged and older, in part because they have both free time and the discretionary income to afford their interest. From the feedback I obtain from readers because I have a Digital Help column I know a large segment of my audience has an interest in B&W photography among those that have a digital darkroom. These people will come to support B&W digital printing solutions when it is no longer necessary to be goofball obsessive¹ to get through the doorway. Regards, David B. Brooks Shutterbug Magazine E-mail: fotografx@... On 10/16/04 11:44 AM, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > > I guess I don't understand the problem. We have choices all the way > from free RGB curves with inexpensive MIS inks, QTR for $50 that you > can literally do anything with, Imageprint for a number of options, to > StudioPrint and Cone. > The neat innovative stuff is always developed by those outside the > mainstream with an eye for some need the major market feels unnecessary. > There are a great number of people making beautiful B&W prints these > day, any number of ways. > Epson has never been in the forefront of how to make outstanding > prints on their own hardware, it's always been addressed by third > parties needing, and developing, more. Even the Atkeson profiles, > which finally made Epson printers work "right" out of the box, were > only brought under the Epson umbrella after they were developed > independently. > Roy, Cone, StudioPrint, ImagePrint, Lyson, Generations, MIS, Paul, you > name it, these are where the advances come from, and it's for the > best. Epson will never see the need for what an advanced artist wants, > it would never occur to them. > Gallery was always more expensive then a mainstream Kodak paper. The > people that need these things are small in number, and they are the > only ones who need it, and they are the ones who can define the need. > Things have come a long way because of all these people, we're up and > printing. > I'd say Epson and the other biggies should stand back and let us do > what we need to do. > Goofball obsessive niche developers are exactly what we need more of. > Tyler > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, claudej1@a... wrote: >> > >> > In a message dated 10/16/2004 10:07:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >> > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com writes: >> > >> > Unless the enthusiasts are >> > into this in the numbers that are possible the market size will limit >> > development and keep costs higher than they would be otherwise, and > a lot of >> > neat innovative stuff will never get developed. >> > >> > Regards, David B. Brooks >> > >> > >> > >> > I agree with your assertion here. As long as Epson thinks that > printing B&W >> > with color inks is acceptable, I don't see it happening. THEIR > market reseach >> > probably tells them that it's not worth making special inks and > drivers for >> > B&W only as it's perceived as a "nitch" market. >> > >> > Used to be that even RA-4 prints were for color only, but with > lasers and >> > pixels, it seems acceptable to make B&W prints from color paper as > long as the >> > profiles are acceptably neutral. The average person has no clue about >> > metamersim.\ >> > >> > There may be only 3 or 4 labs in the country who have dedicated B&W > laser >> > printers with Dektol processors on the back end. >> > >> > Archival really means longer life than the buyer, so we should seek > older >> > clients with more money. >> > >> > Claude >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership > without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the > membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE OWNER AND > MODERATORS OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE OWNER AND MODERATORS OF > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > ADVERTISEMENT > > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=129dcb59k/M=315388.5500238.6578046.3001176/D=grou > ps/S=1705019182:HM/EXP=1098038706/A=2372354/R=0/SIG=12id813k2/*https://www.orc > hardbank.com/hcs/hcsapplication?pf=PLApply&media=EMYHNL40F21004SS> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > * To visit your group on the web, go to: > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/ > * > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub > scribe> > * > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digest Number 2544
2004-10-17 by David B. Brooks
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.