It would be unfair of me to comment in depth, as there have been many QTR updates since the beta version I briefly tested. At that time I did not have a printer that could take advantage of the options you mention. From what I saw at the time, I would say yes. I would qualify that by adding that learning as much as possible about the nature of quad printing and the tools availbe in QTR, and adding a creative attitude in how to bend those tools to your advantage, would put one in a very good position to do many great things with it. What tends to happen on these lists is that when people find tools and methods that begin to work well they go off and get to work, posting rarely. One example is IJC/OPM, we hear little about it here, so I suspect it works very well. So there may be people doing exactly what you want to do with QTR and the PTones, but they are off printing. Sorry I can't be more specific. Tyler --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > > Tyler, > > Do you think QTR is a reliable alternative now for what you do? In > the area of clean output and hue tonable ability with the Piezzo inks? > > John
Message
Re: Tyler's workflow?
2004-10-17 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.