Both these prints are on EAM, despite the 'green' problem I'm having with cone etc , to be fair JC has said that Piezo shouldn't be used on EAM because of the way that the ink reacts with the paper. A lot of people complain about piezo being warm on SE, but SE is notorious for turning piezo brown - PR is not, WR also is not. I send some prints to a well known photog (I won't quote his name as I've not asked permission to share this, but his comments on piezo were as follows: "here's what i think -- there's a really big difference between the piezo prints and a traditional darkroom print. the difference feels to me like the difference between a watercolor painting and an oil painting. in fact the texture of the paper is very much like paper used for watercolors. this doesn't mean that the effect is not pleasing -- but like oils, i don't think it reflects as much light as a darkroom print. this is especially true in the darker areas and the lighter areas, due to the paper, are just not as white. in terms of tonality, the picture that worked the best for me was of the kid in the cart on the boardwalk. and this makes sense since it was all about middle-tones." Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: <rbollini@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2001 2:08 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Paul Roark's Comparison Print. > In the list *Files* section, "Message Related Files", FS-N1-PZO.jpg, > Paul has placed two prints of a landscape printed with the Piezo > software using Piezo inks for one image, and a neutral set of his own > devising for the other. My monitor is calibrated with PhotoCal, and > the colour prints I get from my 1160 using a ProfilerRGB profiler > match wonderfully well with the screen image, so I assume the > impression I have of these two prints is sound. Rich as it is, the > piezo print bears a distinctly green cast. The other print suits my > taste very well, but that's not the point. I want only to ask those > of you who print with the piezo set to look at the prints Paul has > made available and say whether the piezo fairly represents your > experience with these inks. Warm is one thing, green is another. > Bob Bollini > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Paul Roark's Comparison Print.
2001-11-04 by Julian Thomas
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.