Handling icc files is a big job and probably not worth the time for shareware (are you even charging Stephen? I'm on a mac). Besides, where you need soft proofing most, I would think, is while using Photoshop or your favorite data manipulation program. But, don't downplay the usefulness of a good softproof. In my experience, softproofing curves made with an eyeone for QTR curves are very good. I have problems with blocking up in the high 90's and the softproof nails it. I can adjust the deep shadows on the screen and get a very close print. Everytime I look back at something I don't like on the print, the softproof showed it - I just didn't pay attention. Costa --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Billard" <stephen@s...> wrote: > It is not color management (well, not the difference between MAC and PC > anyway.) There are two issues. First, I don't have the knowledge of how to > interpret the curves into RGB changes. Second, I don't have the experience > in working with TIFF images. > > Anyway, from what I have experienced, soft proofing is really not that > accurate. The only real proof is the print. I am not interested in expending > a lot of development effort for something that I think is of marginal value. > > -Stephen > www.sbillard.org/Stephen >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] What would it take - QTR & QTRGUI for windows
2004-11-05 by ccolbertbw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.