Andreas, With respect to UT v. PT fade, in my 2/03 300 hour test the PT-S 50% patch dropped 0.01 density unit, the UT1 with the neutral curve was unchanged. Both were on Photo Rag. With the latest UT formula after 600 hours the UT1 neutral actually increased slightly in density, which is typical of the UT carbon-tone prints, but is the first neutral print I've ever measured to exhibit this. To put this in perspective, the PT and UT inks are both excellent -- way ahead of the Epson Archival inkset in my fade tests, which I do not, however, take to a 30% fade end point. Keep in mind that I was responding to an unsupported statement implying the PT inkset was better. That is simply not true. I will go so far at to say that, as far as I know, there is no neutral-tone inkset for desktop printers that can equal the fade resistance of the latest neutral C86 EZ ink, and I'll send a test strip to anyone who would like to do a comparison fade test. (My goal is to beat the silver print.) I agree with you that a single midtone hue measurement does not mean that the "neutral-selenium" inkjet prints are equal in look to a silver print. There are obviously more variables. However, the PT-S and UT-N hue targets are about the same. One of the inkjet problems has been that the black pigments are warm, whereas the lightly-selenium-toned silver print shadows get cooler. The inksets tend to get cooler at about 75%, but on matte paper there is, so far, no way to stop a warm cross-over as one reaches the deep shadows, where the black ink tone takes over. Eboni and PT-Museum are about as good as matte black gets. However, on glossy paper, the UT2 & UT7 can achieve a cool 100% black because they use the dark grays to generate it. The dark cold gray can keep the 100% neutral or even cool. As to the price comparisons, I look at bulk ink prices. The PT-S 4 oz. cyan bottle is $44. The UT-FSN 4 oz. bottle is $18. The per-print ink costs when refilling the "refill-friendly" carts with MIS UT ink is extremely low. I do not recommend bottom filling/re-filling of older desktop carts, but I find my 7500 carts and the newest C86 and 2200 carts to be extremely easy to refill. (I'm not sure if MIS is still shipping the older, not-so-friendly carts for these machines. I'll check and post the answer I get.) Paul www.PaulRoark.com _____________________________ -----Original Message----- From: aaltenmueller [mailto:a.altenmueller@...] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 1:34 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] comparison hue of piezotone selen - UT-FSN --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > >> ...so can I assume that you see no difference between Piezo and > >>UT-FSN then? > > >... > >I do know piezotone is probably the best product but ... > > No, the UT family does better in fade tests, is glossy compatible, and > cheaper. That puts it ahead in my book. > > The hues are generally matched in that both follow the standard of the > lightly toned silver print, with spectrophotometer readings characterized by > midtone cyan = yellow, and magenta 0.01 density unit higher. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com Better in fade tests? Please tell the link where to read it! Regarding the hue: IMHO the overall look of an BW-print can't be described by a single midtone measurement. Equally measured the look can be quite different. The prices: For small carts and bulk ink you are right, but not for the larger 7xxx and 9xxx carts. Andreas Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Digital BW] comparison hue of piezotone selen - UT-FSN
2004-11-16 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.