Dear People, Please excuse the ignorance of a person new to these printing techniques, but what does "fs" stand for and what is "custom dot gain"? Thanks for enlightening me. Roger Smith Message: 15 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:37:59 +0100 From: "Julian Thomas" <julianthomas@...> Subject: Re: Re: piezo v ms fs I was astounded when I oopened the package. I'm subjecting these two prints to very close scrutiny! I guess that printing a file that was set up for piezo, you'd need to do an inverted S curve to lower contrast. When I get my own inks I'll do a side by side and try and nail it. As it stands FS is easily good enough for proofing and leave Piezo for the fine prints. My father is visiting at the moment, so I can't play too much! I'm amazed at how close the colour is. Piezo seems to have more depth, but this is subjective, and I can't try and match prints until I have FS myself. Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hap Mullenneaux" <hapm@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:29 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: piezo v ms fs > Julian, > I used the EAM profile and there were no adjustments in that print. > I usually use custom dot gain to lighten and bring detail out of the > shadows but that print was done without it. > Hap >
Message
fs, custom dot gain?
2001-11-07 by Roger Smith
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.