Arghh!! I meant: Better to deliver the printer a tonal range it can handle (45-243)..... > From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...> > Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:42:47 +0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Tonal range and linearization > > Yes what you say is correct. As set up at the moment, a 255 pixel (or > normalised pixel value of 1) goes to paper white 0.043 and 0 pixel to 1.65. > But note that the gamma of such a range is completely different from the > workspace gamma. In the workspace gamma we go from density values of 0.043 to > 1.65 in pixel values of 243 to 45. This is my point. As a result, we work in > a tonal range of 0-255 with a gamma of 2.2 yet print with a device which has a > tonal range of 45-243 and a gamma of lord knows what....No wonder we don't get > a WYSIWYG output. Better to deliver the printer a tonal range it can handle > (43-293) and have it calibrated to the same gamma as our workspace. No? > > >> From: Tyler Boley <tyler@...> >> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> >> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:20:01 -0000 >> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> >> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Tonal range and linearization >> >> >> >> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale >> <stevekale@b...> wrote: >> >> snip... >> >>> For EEM which I will say has a density range of 0.043 to 1.65, this >> range is >>> approximately, using the 0-255 scale, pixels from 18 to 243, assuming a >>> gamma of 2.2. Anything outside this range can't be reproduced... >> >> >> Steve, perhaps you correct yourself later in the post (sorry, out of >> time) but this is incorrect. >> The entire path from numbers exiting Photoshop to ink hitting paper >> does not clip as you suggest. >> >> 255 winds up mapping to your 0.043 paper, and 0 to your 1.65 ink >> black. All in between is "compressed" accordingly. If you have >> clipping such as you imply, there are other problems. The nature of >> the compression is determined by your entire workflow and device >> characteristics. >> >> Tyler >> www.custom-digital.com >>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Tonal range and linearization
2004-12-02 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.