Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > Ken Carney writes: > > >>You are welcome. BTW, I wouldn't save anything as a jpg. Repeated saves of >>a jpg image will result in a degraded image, as jpg is a "lossy" >>compression. > > > JPEG is generally fine for archiving, and it saves a tremendous amount > of space. You don't normally resave archived JPEGs over and over, so > the lossy compression is not a factor (provided that you save the > original archive image with minimal compression). > > Alternatives are lossless formats like TIFF or PNG, but they are only > practical if you have a great deal of space for archives. I can only > put one TIFF on a CD, for example, and with thousands of images at one > image per CD, it gets impractical. I would if I could, though. > > >>Using uncompressed tif should work fine, or native Photoshop >>format. > > > PSDs are sometimes even larger than TIFFs. > For archiving though, where you are not looking at the image on a regular basis, you can use other compression mechanisms. For example if you can compress a 600MB file down to say 50MB for archiving, and then decompress it again later, who cares? Even if it takes an hour to compress/decompress. W
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Computing power
2004-12-04 by The Wogster
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.