Steve; I just checked the MIS website; the gloss optimizer is still there. Did you talk to them and were told it was going to be pulled? I hope not! My thanks to Roy for the quick fix on the 7600/9600 QTR; not only is it running, but the 2880 dpi setting is working too! So now I've tested the GLOP with a UC B&W image also, though I sprayed it on rather than using the printer. A very light coat did wonders for both the RC and Glossy papers. I think I'm in love with the glossy look, it gets rid of that hard plastic shine and looks much more acceptable as a fine-art gallery print! I hope MIS don't screw it up by making it super shiny! Steven Karafyllakis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > Steve > > Awesome! I guess it works as promised and can be fired by a non R800 > printer albeit with a little refinement. > > > > > From: Steven Karafyllakis <steve@s...> > > > > > > > > Hello All; > > > > I received the bottle of MIS Gloss Optimizer (GLOP) this past > > Thursday and have some results to report that anyone using UC inks > > on RC papers will find very interesting. > > > > The first tests were done with MIS UC-clones in a 7600, with Eboni > > K. First tests indicate that the GLOP is NOT compatible with EBONI- > > it not only doesn't help it in any way, but a heavy enough coat > > causes the ink to bead and craze and generally look very ugly. I > > then took out the Eboni and replaced it with MIS Universal K, an ink > > I was not very pleased with when I first tried it. I will probably > > wind up using with MIS PK. As my final solution for RC papers. > > > > The first quick test I did was to put some in a cheap ($20.00) > > Badger air brush and spray it on a couple different papers, just to > > see if it was worth the effort to proceed. Results: GLOP does less > > than nothing for matte papers-it actually hurts the DmaX a bit. > > Not surprising as the issue that it is meant to treat is the lack of > penetration into RC media by the pigment inks. > > > > > Well, 'in for a penny, in for a pound' I thought, and repeated the > > procedure with my 1280, which up until now has had nothing but dyes > > in it, and has very little wear. The nozzle check was good the first > > time, so I overprinted several pages of test images I had prepared > > the night before. The papers I tested were: > > > > Epson Premium Glossy > > Ilford Classic Gloss > > Epson Premium Semi-matte-250 > > Proof-line Photo glossy DP > > Oriental Graphica Lustre > > Proof-line Semi-matte/DP > > Proof-line Photo Lustre > > > > The 'image' was a simple 100% black rectangle applied through > > the 'color controls' setting with only the black ink, at 1440 dpi > > and high speed on. > > You talk about "as an overcoat" at the end of your post. So you printed the > image and then ran it through for gloss or did the gloss go on as part of > the weave? > > MIS have pulled the gloss off their site. I look forward to hen the sell > their version 2.... > > Steve
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Gloss Optimizer as overcoat-report
2004-12-06 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.