Steve, I appreciate you are writing for entertainment value here. But to answer you: Actually, yes, I have a great deal of fun. Every tool -- and a camera in the end is a tool -- every tool imposes its own limitations. In my view of the world, having a tool that is self-sufficient is liberating in many more ways than it is limiting. And as a creative device, the flexibility offered by a view camera cannot be touched by a digital camera. Imitated, yes, but not touched. Ultimately, every person has to weigh the tools available and choose one that best fits his or her creative vision. I choose a world without electrical cameras. Why does that bother you? True story number one: I shoot Polaroid emulsions with hotlights, through a 95-year-old Dagor lens, with the aperture wide open. When my model is turned away from the camera, I swing the front standard to bring the focal plane parallel to her face. This has the effect of keeping her face in perfect focus, but blurring other parts of her. For a sample (contains nudity) see www.pbase.com/sandersm/image/36078782 . I have received several emails from digital shooters, asking me how I blurred the image in Photoshop. True story number two: Several people, who have seen my work, have written to compliment it, with the caveat that they wish I would stop adding those silly Photoshop borders into my images. That's when I have to tell them that it's not a PS effect, but the actual emulsion of the film itself, that the PS effects were designed to imitate. What this tell me is that I am so old that the people now getting digital cameras and calling themselves photographers find film such a remote part of the past as to be completely beyond their comprehension. But I digress. Granted, Steve, I cannot do many of the things you can do with your electric cameras. But there is no way on God's earth you could make my images, either. And it's just as well that way. Sanders McNew www.mcnew.net --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Kale <stevekale@b...> wrote: > And that in turn will define in the end the sort of photography you can > do... Have fun. By the way do you own anything electrical? <g> > > > > From: <sandersm@a...> > > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 11:10:10 EST > > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Camera > > > > > > > > In a message dated 12/9/04 10:53:01 AM, Steve Kale writes: > > > > > >> You can't possibly be serious! A courier can carry a DVD, memory card or > >> other storage device. Camera power is an identical issue for both digital > >> and analogue cameras. > >> > > > > I will not buy or shoot a camera that requires electricity. Rolleiflex, > > Graflex, Sinar. Camera power is provided my dry bony fingers. > > > > Sanders McNew > > www.mcnew.net
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Digital Camera
2004-12-09 by sandersnyc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.