I am wondering is someone can compare QTR to Paul Roark's methodology of making B and W prints from both an ease of use and technical standpoint (print quality as you define it). I tried installing QTR and QTR GUI in the next to last version on my WIN XP machine - Epson 1270 with MIS inks and it did not seem to work for me (long story). I just started using the Roark curves and it is working. I have not spent much time using this system, but it seems like a large number of posters to this list are using QTR and are enthusiastic about this system (QTR). I am wondering whether I should try getting the QTR to work on my machine. What does QTR allow you to do that the Roark curves do not? It may help to know that I am looking at getting an epson 2200 to do color work also. Will either system allow me to do both color and b and w on a 2200? I do understand from reading through the list that both are excellent systems but from a newcomer's perspective I am having a hard time figuring out the quality difference between the two systems. From an ease of use perspective, Paul's methodology seems easier to set up inititally.
Message
roark vs qtr - newbie q.
2004-12-13 by jarrrush
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.