And can anyone comment on the Epson Gray Balancer - see review here http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/printers/gray-balancer.shtml (perhaps I should post this as a separate thread since it's not a direct answer/comment to the origuinal post) ================================================ > ....What does QTR allow you to do that the Roark > curves do not? It may help to know that I am looking at getting an > epson 2200 to do color work also. Will either system allow me to do > both color and b and w on a 2200? .... > > I have used both systems. Pauls system I used on a 1160 with MIS UT > inks and worked without a hitch. However it requires you to convert > your printer to B&W by replacing the coloured inks with a set of > black/grey inks. Its a straight forward system and you print using > the Epson driver. However if you want to print colour and BW from the > same printer, then a RIP is the only answer. I recently bought a > 2100/2200 and using OEM inks print colour through the Epson driver > and BW using QTR. Roys QTR is a great product at a bargin price. > Installing QTR on a Mac is a doddle, on PC maybe more difficult but > certainly worth trying. There are two other RIPs that I know of, > ImagePrint and IJC/OPM. ImagePrint RIP is expensive but does print > colour and B&W, and comes with many profiles. Its also does a lot > more than just print and is a standalone product. IJC/OPM is like QTR > a BW only RIP, but again is a standalone product and so should be > easier to setup on your machine if you have problems with QTR. I have > no experience of either. Check their web sites for more info. > > Hope this helps a little. > > Peter > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jarrrush" > <johnr@v...> wrote: > > > > I am wondering is someone can compare QTR to Paul Roark's > methodology > > of making B and W prints from both an ease of use and technical > > standpoint (print quality as you define it). I tried installing QTR > > and QTR GUI in the next to last version on my WIN XP machine - > Epson > > 1270 with MIS inks and it did not seem to work for me (long story). > > > > I just started using the Roark curves and it is working. I have not > > spent much time using this system, but it seems like a large number > > of posters to this list are using QTR and are enthusiastic about > this > > system (QTR). I am wondering whether I should try getting the QTR > to > > work on my machine. What does QTR allow you to do that the Roark > > curves do not? It may help to know that I am looking at getting an > > epson 2200 to do color work also. Will either system allow me to do > > both color and b and w on a 2200? I do understand from reading > > through the list that both are excellent systems but from a > > newcomer's perspective I am having a hard time figuring out the > > quality difference between the two systems. From an ease of use > > perspective, Paul's methodology seems easier to set up inititally.
Message
Re: roark vs qtr - newbie q.
2004-12-13 by frankg_photo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.