Hard to believe only two weeks have gone by and no remembers I just reported on this issue; The MIS R800 gloss optimizer works quite well in a cartridge, and does an excellent job of eliminating bronzing and increasing Dmax, without the mess and noxious fumes of the canned products and lacquers. It does not provide quite the physical protection of Printshield, but is nonetheless quite worthwhile for the benefits it does provide. Keeping some in a cart and switching for batch coating would be fairly easy, though it would require flushing the K head with Windex or something similar before the coating so no K ink mixes into the coating. Even if that doesn't work for you, using a $20.00 model-making airbrush and spraying it on is very easy, the coating is easy to get on evenly, in one or two light coats. One big caveat: This stuff works well on semi-matte, lustre, and glossy RC PAPERS, but not on matte, and not with Eboni ink. It does fine with UC inks and the PK or even MIS 'Universal K'. If anyone was to see a sample of it, email me off-line. I'll send out a few for the price of postage. Steve Karafyllakis --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steve Kale" <stevekale@b...> wrote: > > I, like many others, have had all sorts of difficulties spraying RC paper prints. (I have tried > Lyson Print Guard which people tend to believe is the same thing as Print Shield.) I really > don't think it works very well and is horrible on images with great expanses of deep black > - read mottled blacks and trapped dust. But the recent glop dicussion begs the following: > > Could someone like MIS develop a Print Shield like coating and instead of putting it in an > aerosol can put it in a refillable ink cartridge? Our printers are already capable of precise > spraying of ink, how about a protective coating? Any RIP/driver could be used to "spray" > an already printed image. > > Thoughts?
Message
Re: Coating prints-why not?
2004-12-17 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.