> HP Premium Plus Photo Glossy, Satin (formerly Matte) and High Gloss. > > Those will give the longevity that we all desire, especially when > nput behind glass. > This caught my eye, and I couldn't resist re-posting part of the fade test I did in March. After 600 hours in my tester, the 50% patch of the Epson Premium Semigloss printed with neutral MIS UT inks then sprayed with PremierArt Print Shield and HP paper printed with their B&W inkset had the following starting and ending spectrophotometer readings: Prem. SG start: C = .58, M = .57, Y = .58, Visual Density = .58 After 600 Hr: C = .58, M = .57, Y = .58, Visual Density = .58 HP start: C = .80, M = .79, Y = .76, Visual Density = .79 After 600 Hr: C = .78, M = .76, Y = .72, Visual Density = .77 So, while the HP B&W dyes may be very good for dyes, and maybe good enough for most uses, I don't think they are equal to the good B&W pigments. How all this translates into actual fading in display I don't know. However, if one wants the best B&W digital print resistance to fading, I think the predominantly carbon pigment systems are still the way to go. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Which printer for B&W
2004-12-19 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.