Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] More on Glop overcoating

2004-12-21 by Steve Kale

If you are using the 7600 and UC inks then use the M or C slot.  Tweaking
the QTR curve is not hard (Carl has given me a few lessons - thanks for your
patience Carl!).  Are you using the standard (ie provided) curves or your
own?  What platform?  I can send you a curve to flush the cart if you need
it but I do think you are better off using one of the other slots as
K,LK,LC,LM and Y are used by the QTR curves already.

BTW I took a walk through your website today - very nice stuff (and good
links section)


> From: Steven Karafyllakis <steve@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:55:45 -0000
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] More on Glop overcoating
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry Steve, I guess I haven't been clear enough: I'm running the
> glop in a 1280 with the Epson driver, but printing the UC inks in a
> 7600 with QTR. I need to flush the LK in the 7600-without wasting
> the equivalent amount in all the other colors. Changing the K ink is
> not as expensive since you can do so with out flushing all the other
> lines, but the rest of the inks are a different story.
> 
> I'm taking this approach rather than blending it in for a couple
> reasons, not the least of which is -if it works, in the end I will
> need to be able to use it with the 7600, but retain color printing
> capability. I simply can't commit that machine to some exotic
> combination of greyscale inks. In all likelyhood, if it does work
> well enough, the glop will wind up in the 7500, either in the K
> channel, or blended in through one of the other channels as Carl
> Scoffield is doing with his 2200. I'm just not ready to commit to
> that without knowing I have a viable functioning system and a better
> option than the matte ink on watercolor papers. So far, as you can
> tell from my previous posts, the execution has been problematic and
> inconsistent-but the results! the prints I have that are flawless
> absolutely kick ass, pardon my Greek (I can say that, being Greek
> myself). Well worth a bit more effort to work out the bugs.
> 
> Thanks for the info, I'll work it out as soon as the Epson cart gets
> to me & post again on the results with Epson LK instead of MIS.
> 
> Steve Karafyllakis

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.