shashinka@... wrote: > > In a message dated 11/11/01 12:26:26 AM, steadmanuhlich@... writes: > > <snip> > > >As for acid...everyone has a different opinion...mine is that the pens are > accurate enough to tell when the paper is acid...which is what the pens tell > us about those two papers. This was discussed in detail on the PiezoBW list > in about June or July as I recall. Well, it might have been discussed on another list, that does not make anything fact. I for one do not think you can trust those pens by themselves. Archivalness is about more than just acid free. If the paper base is wood pulp, and has been buffered, it might read as acid free at the moment, but in fact, is not archival or acid free. The latest studies show that the buffering agents react very poorly with inkjet inks and should be avoided if one is looking for long term paper/print stability. Just as one should avoid optical brighteners. In the FWIW department: Read the pdf file: 'Stability Issues and Test Methods for Ink Jet Materials, Barbara Vogt, Department of Image Engineering, University of Applied Science, Cologne'. Be aware that it is a 62 page thesis on the below site: http://www.geocities.com/mortenryhl/index.html Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] EAM and Epson WC paper & mounting
2001-11-13 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.