Bernhard, I have Piezo on a 1200 and MIS VM on a 1280. I see no difference in sharpness or the amount of detail between the two. While the Piezo driver will accept any input resolution with no effect on performance, inputting files over 360 dpi to the Epson driver greatly increase image processing times without offering any visual improvements in the image. Since the end result is the same, I really don't know what the Piezo driver does with the extra information. Martin Wesley --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Bernhard Ess" <albatros.bee@w...> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Roger Smith > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... > Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 11:02 PM > Subject: [Digital BW] MIS VT with Paul's curves > > > I have never used the Piezo system, or for > that matter seen the results, but it's hard for me to imagine that they are > any better than what I am seeing. > > Me neither I haven´t used the Piezo system, however I wonder about resolution: I read on the Piezo3000 list that the Cone driver can handle input files of more than 360dpi *and* print more detail, whereas the Epson driver´s limit is just 360. Can anybody say something about his experience with detail resolution and Epson vs. Cone? My MIS FS prints are nice, but its always interesting to get better... > > greetings bernhard > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MIS VT with Paul's curves
2001-11-13 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.