Frank, About a week back Ron Landucci (Post #79) said essentially the same thing. He reported that he really couldn't see any difference between the desktop printers output and the 7000 under standard viewing conditions. Martin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., frank@c... wrote: > Hi Paul, It's good to find you on this list. I wanted to tell you > about my friend's switch from 3000 to 7000. His prints are great, but > when I compare the same file on each printer side by side (cone > system), I'm hard pressed to say the 7000 is significantly better. > Through a loup it looks tighter, but that 3000 has held it's own over > the years. > > Incidently, I just bought an 1160 and have not set it up yet for Piezo, > but I was disappointed to hear that you think the 3000 is superior. I > thought I was buying "state of the art" for Piezo work. The 3000 must > have the longest production run of any Epson printer. > > Frank > http://www.culturalvsions.com > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" < > paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > Todd, > > > > I have not seen any direct, objective comparisons between the 7000 and the > > smaller-dot Epsons to know whether there is a visible difference. The > > prints and test strips I've seen from the 7000 using the Epson driver are > > excellent, so I assume it will be visually equal to the others and > > presumably better than the alternative for large prints -- the 3000. (I > > assume no one would buy either of these unless you want to do large prints. > > For me, the 16x20 has always been my target size, so I now have a 3000 as > > well as an 1160.) > > > > I don't know how the dot sizes of the 3000 and 7000 compare, but I assume > > the 7000 is smaller. Additionally, the 7000 with the variable- tone inkset > > will be a true hextone -- which does make a small difference; more shades of > > ink allow for smoother outputs. (Note that the Piezo 7000 inkset is really > > just a quad -- 4 total shades, not 6. The nozzle checks with Piezo ink > > indicate that the light/photo shade inks are the same densities as the > > others. That is, the magenta and light/photo magenta are the same.) > > > > As good as I expect the 7000 to be, I want to add that I've been pleasantly > > surprised at the high quality of the 3000 output. That printer has large > > dots and a bad reputation for paper handling and banding (especially with > > the Piezo driver). In test strips using the variable-tone inkset I can see > > some graininess, but in 16x20s, I don't see any evidence of it. My medium > > format Tmax 100 negatives appear to be the limiting factors, not the 3000's > > dots. Using Archival Matte fed from the front, the printer feeds perfectly > > and has no banding. (I think it is actually better than my 1160.) (I have > > a pre-release 24" roll of Archival Matte. It'll be released next month by > > Epson.) > > > > You'll notice that for the 3000 I have two "NC" (neutral-cool) curves. What > > I found is that different curves produce dots at different places. Contrary > > to my expectations, the dots are not visible in the highlights (where the > > Epson ink in the 3000 shows bad dots). Rather, the dots show up in the > > midtones or dark tones. On most of the curves, the dots are so mild as to > > be irrelevant. With the NC curves, however, I decided to make two versions > > so that if the dots do show in a print, the other curve can be used and the > > dots may then be in a place where they will not show. > > > > So, to get back to the 7000, I expect it will be a great printer with the > > variable-tone inkset. However, if one can't afford the 7000, and if you can > > live with paper thin enough to feed from the front, I would not hesitate to > > buy a 3000. For 16x20s it is the cheap way to go, and my 16x20 Archival > > Matte prints look great. (I may need to remove a pizza wheel, but I haven't > > bothered yet.) > > > > Paul > > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Todd Flashner [mailto:tflash@e...] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:20 PM > > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y... > > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Greetings > > > > > > Welcome back Paul. Alaska Huh? Lucky boy. > > > > Looks like MIS is up to good things. > > > > Question: with Piezo, the 7000 seems to be the top of the line from a > > quality-output point of view (as well as everything else too, I suppose) - > > is that true with your variable-tone method too, or with it's larger > > droplet > > size than some of the smaller printers, does the 7000's output suffer > > relative to them? > > > > Todd > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm back, and glad to see that there is a new and independent forum for > > > discussing B&W printing technologies. The Piezo forum has lots of > > > knowledgeable people, but it's really only for Piezo inks. The > > Epson-inkjet > > > forum is also very useful, but I'm really just into B&W, and most of the > > > discussions there are not that relevant. > > > > > > How does this forum compare to the DigitalSilver@t... forum? > > > > > > At any rate, I'm back. > > > > > > It looks like MIS has posted some of the variable-tone (their "variable > > > mix") materials. I'll be finishing the 1280 curves soon. The 7000 is > > also > > > now in the works. (Interestingly, a 2000 user is switching in the > > > variable-tone inkset. I had never though of that as a 3rd party ink > > > machine.) > > > > > > Paul > > > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > > > > > > If you do not wish to belong to Digital B&W, The Print, you may > > > unsubscribe by sending an email to: > > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@y... > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > > > > > > > If you do not wish to belong to Digital B&W, The Print, you may > > unsubscribe by sending an email to: > > DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@y... > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Greetings -- 7000 (& 3000)
2001-08-09 by mwesley250@earthlink.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.