You mentioned using the inks from the Epson 10600 series. Isn't that a different ink than UC and not as archival ? Scott --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Scott, > > That would be interesting. I have not had access to that type of equipment. > Let us know what you find. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: scott_now_coming [mailto:scott_now_coming@y...] > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:09 PM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: UC-based UT7 clone (was " MIS inks") > > > > So, you haven't tried to analyize > the Epson inks (or others)with a Spectrometer to see their make up? > > Unless Epson has invented those coatings and their properties have > never been published, the Spectrometer should be able to show the > make up. > > I'm under the impression that a Spectrometer will tell the contents > of a sample and at what percentage they are. > > Scott > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > Scott, > > > > >Are these inks anything more than carbon, glycerol, and water? > > > > Yes. The Epson pigs are coated and probably not available anywhere > but from > > Epson. In addition to the coating, the pigments themselves may be > more > > proprietary pigment than carbon. The base they use has some > proprietary > > chemicals in it that are not disclosed in the MSDS. But, at the > dilution I > > used, the water and glycerol seems to work. That mixture is the > least > > likely to have negative interactions with the Epson base, since > their base > > is that plus some other materials. > > > > Even the un-coated pigs MIS uses are probably not pure carbon, even > though > > the supplier says they are "carbon." > > > > >If I know the make up of the ink, I can make it myself. > > > > I'm not so ambitious as to mill my own. > > > > >Your UT-7 clone do not need curves if you just want neutral > through > > >warm prints. Just use the Epson sliders in the driver. Correct? > > > > Yes, the sliders give you some control, but curves give a lot > more. The UT7 > > curves work reasonably well with the clone inkset described. > > > > >The "ink particles" are 0.19 microns. Epson nozzles are > > >25 microns +- 5 microns. > > > > Close. The particles per se are not a problem. Agglomerations > are. The > > quality of the dispersant and other parts of the base are part of > the trick. > > > > >Have you made inks from "Scratch"? > > > > I don't have a mill. But after that, it's wide open, and filters > to be sure > > there are no clunkers are available. > > > > Good luck. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > ______________________________________ > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > > > >>I've published on this forum the formula > > > >>for a UT7-clone based on Epson UC inks. > > > > > > >Can you point me to that post? > > > > > > I posted this on 7/19/04 with the Subject, "UltraChrome-based > > variable-tone > > > inkset": > > > > > > > > > "This is my 6-14 formula for the UC-VT (for the 2200) I recently > > tested. It > > > is very similar in its behavior to UT7, but the formulas are > > different. > > > With sliders set to 0, the 50% patch of an EEM print had C,M,Y > > = .60, .61, > > > .60. > > > > > > "The base: 4 parts distilled water and 3 parts glycerol. (I > used > > Kic > > > technical grade.) > > > > > > "(In the past, I've had trouble finding a base that worked well > > with the UC > > > inks. The simple base I used for this inkset does the job and > > anyone can > > > make it.) > > > > > > "Blue used in mixing: 50% UC M, 50% UC C. > > > > > > "K position: I prefer Eboni. Epson UC matte black would also > work. > > > > > > "LK position: UC LK, no changes. > > > > > > "C position: 70% UC PK, 30% UC LK. > > > > > > "LC position: 52% UC LK, 48% base. > > > > > > "M position: 30% blue, 40% LK, 30% PK. > > > > > > "LM position: 30% LK, 10% blue, 60% base. > > > > > > "Y position: 88% LC, 7% Y, 5% M. > > > > > > "This is not necessarily a final formula, but it's close and > > works. I had > > > no clogging or other problems with these experimental inksets. > > (Nor do I > > > have clogging problems with MIS inksets.)" > > > > > > >And how did you come to a starting point? > > > > > > I'm not sure what you're asking here. > > > > > > >I've been thinking of making inks myself. > > > >My wife is a chemist and I'm sure we could do it. > > > > > > I'm sure most on this list could make the above. It thought that > a > > small > > > ink seller might want to take on this inkset for those who have a > > prejudice > > > against third-party inks or prefer coated pigs. But, no one has > > picked it > > > up. > > > > > > Note that I also made one based on the Epson Archival inkset that > I > > thought > > > might have more marketing potential for an ink seller. However, > in > > my > > > initial fade testing the UC-based version did better than the > Epson > > Archival > > > version. (The Epson Archival black is about like the old MIS VM > > black in > > > fading. I think it is actually a hybrid pigment-dye ink -- not > in > > the same > > > league with the current MIS and Epson matte and photo blacks.) > > > > > > Have fun. > > > > > > Paul > > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > ___________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > > > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > > > > Ben, > > > > > > > > >...wondering if anyone ... wanted to comment on issues like > > > > >lightfastness, ... > > > > > > > > I concluded several years ago that I had to do my own testing. > > So, > > > I made a > > > > fluorescent light fader (cheap but probably about as good as > > any), > > > and > > > > started doing carefully-controlled comparison tests. (I'll > leave > > > the > > > > predictions of years of display to Wilhelm and RIT.) That is > > what > > > convinced > > > > me to switch from Piezo to MIS inks. The cheaper MIS inks were > > more > > > > lightfast. > > > > > > > > Now both companies have new and very lightfast pigments. I > still > > > do some > > > > testing, however, to see if anything better comes around and > even > > > to explore > > > > non-inkset sources of pigments. > > > > > > > > The bottom line is that the MIS UltraTone family of pigments > has > > > beat every > > > > other inkset I've tested, including the Epson Archival > pigments. > > > The carbon > > > > pigments seem to be the very best in terms of their retaining > the > > > visual > > > > density after lots of light exposure. The carbon does warm up > a > > > bit, > > > > however. I think the amount of warming is acceptable and not > > > unlike what we > > > > see with other traditional B&W media. > > > > > > > > Last year the magenta (which is in the cool and neutral inks) > was > > > the > > > > relative weakling. So, at that time I recommended pure carbon, > > > like the MIS > > > > EZ-Warm, for the best lightfastness. (For archival, dark > storage > > > the paper > > > > base and storage conditions are the limiting factors, not the > > > pigments.) > > > > Now the latest formulations have substituted a new pigment for > > the > > > magenta. > > > > Because of this, the new UT neutral inks are almost as > lightfast > > as > > > the > > > > carbon. > > > > > > > > Of course, I may not be totally un-biased here. MIS's business > > > model is > > > > such that it simply produces what the market wants. It does > not > > do > > > its own > > > > B&W inkset designs, but it is an expert in finding good inks > that > > > act as the > > > > inputs for the B&W inksets. As a practical matter, during the > > last > > > few > > > > years, the B&W inksets have been formulations that I've come up > > > with. So, > > > > while I'm independent and do this for my own non-monetary > > purposes, > > > one > > > > could argue that I may have a bias toward the inksets I > > > formulated. On the > > > > other hand, I formulated them in response to my fade tests, and > > my > > > goal is > > > > to get the medium to the point where it is accepted by > collectors > > > as equal > > > > to the silver print. Additionally, I've published on this > forum > > > the formula > > > > for a UT7-clone based on Epson UC inks. I also published the > > fade > > > test > > > > results, and the UC-based UT7 did great in their delta e, but > not > > > as well as > > > > the MIS inks in density reduction (fading). > > > > > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > > > > > Paul > > > > www.PaulRoark.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > > resources as > > > they are often being updated. > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > > wish to > > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > > this same > > > page. > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier > messages > > to keep > > > them short. > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > > flames. > > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > > > membership without notice. > > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of > digital > > B&W > > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > > removed from > > > the membership. > > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules > and > > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the > group > > Owner and > > > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > > section: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, > THE > > PRINT > > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" > AND > > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > > LIABLE TO YOU > > > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > > EXEMPLARY > > > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF > PROFITS, > > > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF > > THE "OWNER" AND > > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN > ADVISED > > OF THE > > > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE > > INABILITY > > > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED > > ACCESS TO OR > > > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > > CONDUCT OF ANY > > > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY > > OTHER > > > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other > resources as > > they are often being updated. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to > > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same > > page. > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep > > them short. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or > flames. > > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > > membership without notice. > > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital > B&W > > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be > removed from > > the membership. > > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group > Owner and > > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files > section: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE > PRINT > > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE > LIABLE TO YOU > > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR > EXEMPLARY > > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF > THE "OWNER" AND > > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED > OF THE > > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE > INABILITY > > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED > ACCESS TO OR > > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR > CONDUCT OF ANY > > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY > OTHER > > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
[Digital BW] Re: UC-based UT7 clone (was " MIS inks")
2005-01-04 by scott_now_coming
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.