Hello Ernie, I used the PiezographyBW plugin (same as R9 by Sundance)intially when trying to learn BW printing and found all the lower midtones to be blocked up and muddy. Then I upgraded to the BWIcc profiles and used MIS FSN inks and got very good tones all the way from black to white. Then MIS said they were going to discontinue FSN in favor of the new UT inks by Paul Roark, who is on this newgroup a lot. I bought the UT2 inks and have been very well pleased with them. I use both the curves by Paul and am trying out QTR by Roy Harrington to see the difference in ink consumption and tones. So far the QTR uses less ink that the Epson driver with sliders set to zero, but Prefer the warmer tones of the sliders. I'm still learning QTR's finer points at this time. Your friend in Photography, Johnny --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, ernie nitka <enitka1@c...> wrote: > > Howdy - I'm new to the group and wanted to know if anyone is using this > combo. I am and recently have been underwhelmed by it. My workflow is to > get the TIF looking the way I want it in Photoshop CS and then export it to > the R9 Driver. I've tried playing with the gamma but my reading of the > manual is that this only effects the mid-tones. I've recently been able to > get better looking prints from my Epson 960 using soft proofing and the OEM > inks. I'm thinking of going with the MIS inks and curves. > > Any thoughts. > > Ernie Nitka
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Sundance R9 and 1280
2005-01-05 by Johnny Eades
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.