I had the exact same result. Very strange. I also created a color profile for this paper. It is very close to Epson Premium Glossy in gamut. Kirkland is able to achieve slightly deeper blacks and saturated colors in the 3/4 tones, but EpPremGloss does a little better in the lighter shades. Kirkland is a great bargain at 15 cents per sheet, but the marks are or some concern. I also agree that the bronzing is less than EpPremGloss. Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "awahlster" <awahlster@a...> wrote: > > OK went out and bought a couple of packages of this paper today and > first prints while looking great dead on have what appears to be a > roller mark. Except it moves as I rotate the file.(the files are all > slide scans) So it an't a roller mark it ain't in the file as I > printed these same files yesterday on Epson Premium Glossy and they > look perfect. I did the first ones through my Canon i960 (color > printing of course) and then I tried printing the same files with my > Epson 890 (still color as I'm not setup with B&W ink yet) And instead > of one mark I get a whole bunch of them. They all run vertical smae > direction as the print. > > NOW the weird thing I printed a file from my digital camera and no > marks!!! > > These marks can only be seen with glare from my overhead lights across > the print dead on they look beautiful. > > I'm going nuts here any ideas???? > > > Mark W. > > Like the paper but think this is weird.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: KirklandPro Glossy PROBLEMS
2005-01-06 by ldina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.