Mark, I only printed one large scanned image. The original was a 4X5" color photo, and I scaled it up to 8X10 at 300 ppi, 42 bit during the scan. I processed the hell out of it in PS, but it looked tremendous on screen. Actually it looked great on the print too, with the very minor exception of the lines. I haven't tried a digital image yet, as I just bought the paper today. The lines are only noticeable in bright light when held to an angle, and I only see them in the darkets black areas. Kind of weird. They run the length of the print, so they are opposite the travel of the ink jet mechanism. Ahhhh....technology, what a joy! :O) Lou --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "awahlster" <awahlster@a...> wrote: > > > > > Lou, > Can you possibly guess why the prints from a digital camera would not > show these marks???? > > Could it be we are printing at to high of quality? My digital is only > a 4Mp and I've been printing 6X9" prints. > > The last print I just did with the epson only shows the faintest of > lines. So maybe it's some weird thing that will clear up. > > Gotta love these ink sucking problems. I bet the facotries have guys > sitting around trying to build this into the system LOL > > > Mark W. > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ldina" > <lbdina@c...> wrote: > > > > I had the exact same result. Very strange. > > > > I also created a color profile for this paper. It is very close to > > Epson Premium Glossy in gamut. Kirkland is able to achieve slightly > > deeper blacks and saturated colors in the 3/4 tones, but EpPremGloss > > does a little better in the lighter shades. Kirkland is a great > > bargain at 15 cents per sheet, but the marks are or some concern. > > > > I also agree that the bronzing is less than EpPremGloss. > > > > Lou > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "awahlster" > > <awahlster@a...> wrote: > > > > > > OK went out and bought a couple of packages of this paper today and > > > first prints while looking great dead on have what appears to be a > > > roller mark. Except it moves as I rotate the file.(the files are all > > > slide scans) So it an't a roller mark it ain't in the file as I > > > printed these same files yesterday on Epson Premium Glossy and they > > > look perfect. I did the first ones through my Canon i960 (color > > > printing of course) and then I tried printing the same files with my > > > Epson 890 (still color as I'm not setup with B&W ink yet) And > > instead > > > of one mark I get a whole bunch of them. They all run vertical smae > > > direction as the print. > > > > > > NOW the weird thing I printed a file from my digital camera and no > > > marks!!! > > > > > > These marks can only be seen with glare from my overhead lights > > across > > > the print dead on they look beautiful. > > > > > > I'm going nuts here any ideas???? > > > > > > > > > Mark W. > > > > > > Like the paper but think this is weird.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: KirklandPro Glossy PROBLEMS
2005-01-06 by ldina
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.