Digital BW, The Print

Thanks, Sarah, but I printed mine with Hi speed set to off.  I never 
use high speed for photos.

Lou

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "jessupsa" 
<sjessup@c...> wrote:
> 
> Lou,
> I had one print with lines in dark areas, I changed the setting to 
uncheck "high 
> speed," even though the paper's instructions said to use high 
speed. This took care of 
> the problem, and it hasn't recurred. I haven't used high speed 
again.
> Sarah
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ldina" 
<lbdina@c...> wrote:
> > 
> > Mark, 
> > 
> > I only printed one large scanned image.  The original was a 4X5" 
> > color photo, and I scaled it up to 8X10 at 300 ppi, 42 bit during 
the 
> > scan.  I processed the hell out of it in PS, but it looked 
tremendous 
> > on screen.  Actually it looked great on the print too, with the 
very 
> > minor exception of the lines.  I haven't tried a digital image 
yet, 
> > as I just bought the paper today. 
> > 
> > The lines are only noticeable in bright light when held to an 
angle, 
> > and I only see them in the darkets black areas.  Kind of weird.  
They 
> > run the length of the print, so they are opposite the travel of 
the 
> > ink jet mechanism.  
> > 
> > Ahhhh....technology, what a joy!
> > 
> > :O)  Lou
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "awahlster" 
> > <awahlster@a...> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Lou, 
> > > Can you possibly guess why the prints from a digital camera 
would 
> > not
> > > show these marks????
> > > 
> > > Could it be we are printing at to high of quality? My digital 
is 
> > only
> > > a 4Mp and I've been printing 6X9" prints.
> > > 
> > > The last print I just did with the epson only shows the 
faintest of
> > > lines. So maybe it's some weird thing that will clear up.
> > > 
> > > Gotta love these ink sucking problems. I bet the facotries have 
guys
> > > sitting around trying to build this into the system LOL
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Mark W.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ldina"
> > > <lbdina@c...> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I had the exact same result.  Very strange.  
> > > > 
> > > > I also created a color profile for this paper.  It is very 
close 
> > to 
> > > > Epson Premium Glossy in gamut.  Kirkland is able to achieve 
> > slightly 
> > > > deeper blacks and saturated colors in the 3/4 tones, but 
> > EpPremGloss 
> > > > does a little better in the lighter shades.  Kirkland is a 
great 
> > > > bargain at 15 cents per sheet, but the marks are or some 
> > concern.  
> > > > 
> > > > I also agree that the bronzing is less than EpPremGloss.
> > > > 
> > > > Lou
> > > > 
> > > > --- In 
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "awahlster" 
> > > > <awahlster@a...> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > OK went out and bought a couple of packages of this paper 
today 
> > and
> > > > > first prints while looking great dead on have what appears 
to 
> > be a
> > > > > roller mark. Except it moves as I rotate the file.(the 
files 
> > are all
> > > > > slide scans) So it an't a roller mark it ain't in the file 
as I
> > > > > printed these same files yesterday on Epson Premium Glossy 
and 
> > they
> > > > > look perfect.  I did the first ones through my Canon i960 
(color
> > > > > printing of course) and then I tried printing the same 
files 
> > with my
> > > > > Epson 890 (still color as I'm not setup with B&W ink yet) 
And 
> > > > instead
> > > > > of one mark I get a whole bunch of them. They all run 
vertical 
> > smae
> > > > > direction as the print.
> > > > > 
> > > > > NOW the weird thing I printed a file from my digital camera 
and 
> > no
> > > > > marks!!!
> > > > > 
> > > > > These marks can only be seen with glare from my overhead 
lights 
> > > > across
> > > > > the print dead on they look beautiful.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'm going nuts here any ideas????
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mark W.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Like the paper but think this is weird.