I many times showed a friend a real nice print on photo rag and they said ..... "wow, ....and you did this at kinko's?"......(kinko's is a xerox place).......and you show then gloss print they say...."who developed these?".......I actually like glossy better. For a long time I was embarrased to admit that. ....weird. One other thing though, if you show them a print under glass, they never know that it is an inkjet print. And the raggy papers look great from every angle. .....oh well, that's why we have so many papers to choose from, right?.....interesting discussion. This a nice forum. Doug M On Jan 6, 2005, at 3:42 PM, jm-ferreira@... wrote: > So� I showed some prints to friends and relatives (non-photographers) > and > they ALL thought that matte papers look �inkjettish�, > non-photographic. Most > people seem to be used to glossy papers as a photo standard. (if it > doesn�t > bronze, it isn�t a photo!)� Are you people having the same kind of > feedback? > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Paper type and layman's taste: what's your experience?
2005-01-07 by Douglas Meeuwsen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.