--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Pieris Berreitter" <pieris@y...> wrote: > > A skeptic recently said to me, "Ansel Adams cannot be compressed into > 256 shades of gray." I have seen plenty of literature that says we > cannot distinguish anything close to 256 different shades of gray > (I've seen the number 64 mentioned a couple times), making this > statement look a bit uninformed. But it nevertheless got me thinking: > > How many discrete levels of gray (measured with a 12-bit scanner or > densitometer) do we get out of a quadtone inkjet? Can careful curve > mapping actually pull out a distinct 256 values? The answer "enough" > is good enough for the subjective viewer, but being curious... > > Just wondering if anyone has done this, or if it should be my exercise > for this weekend. > > -Pieris I think studies have been done that put the number of distinguishable grays on paper by the human eye somewhere near 100. But you need more than that because in a smooth gradation you don't want two distinguishable grays right next to each other. That would show a transition. To get a smooth transition you need at least a gray in between that doesn't appear distinguishable from either of the other two. This probably puts you in the ballpark of 256 grays. I think this is the main fuel for the ongoing debate of 8 bit vs 16 bit workflow and image files. This argument misses an important issue I believe. Sure 8 bits = 256 values, but any measurement of gray value contains many pixels or many ink dots on paper. On an Epson printer printing at 1440x720 a small 1/16 inch square is made up of over 4000 potential dots of several inks. How many different grays you can measure has a lot more to do with the specs of the densitometer rather than the 8 bit pixel data. It may seem counter-intuitive but you can easily measure more that 256 grays with just an 8 bit file. What is important if you do get to measuring grays is that they are reasonably even-spaced over the whole range. Roy
Message
Re: How many shades of gray
2005-01-13 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.