on 11/14/01 10:08 AM, Mark Tucker wrote: > After the endless search for the Holy Grail, I think I've found my > home. I settled on Generations4. The way I understand it, I > ended up with the supposed "new yellow", which they've been > selling for a year now, and the "Standard Black", which is all > pigment and contains no dye, (different from their "Enhanced > Black" which does contain some dye). Mark I'll be curious to hear how you feel about your prints (longevity aside) with the Gens vs your former dye based inks. Personally, and I don't have a lot of experience with color Pigs yet, all things being equal I like the depth and translucence of the dye inks best. But I too am thinking of making the move to Generations. However, in a newsletter from Digital Art Supplies I did receive the snippet below, which gives pause: "Wilhem Research's web site is finally back up. They have posted some preliminary information about new archivability tests & one of the most important to our users is for the Schoellershammer Velvet #10 paper. The paper was tested with Lysonic inks and has tested at 85-95 years. This is very important as Lyson's inks are dye based, which have in the past inherently lasted a shorter time than pigmented inks." Anyway, Generations seems to have a product that you can't really go wrong with, but I'm curious to hear your thoughts as you compare your prints. I liked your exchange print and image very much BTW. You must make your rep very happy. ;-)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Gen 4 longevity (was Re: RGB Workflow)
2001-11-14 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.