> Among the neutral-cool dark gray inks, FSN-C is the least magenta cast. > (There is none of the old magenta in these mixes, and I hate to say it's > "green.") It has the same ratio of color pigments as the UT7 LK-N. > > If you were into mixing inks, you could use these to mix the other grays. > > On the other hand, you might find that one of these in a printer might give > you the control you need. are you referring to Ultratone FSN-C? the CLOSEST i have gotten to eliminating that magenta cast was using the following in my 1280....(all ultratone inks) Pk, FSN-C, FSN-M, FSN-C, EZN, & MIS GP Archival Light Cyan (actual light cyan). this gave me a coolish print, with still a "hit" of magenta/coolish tone in the darker areas. for some subjects, it was quite pleasing, but if prefer just a neutral print every day. right now i've switched to the 2200, and also have IJC.(so i wouldn't HAVE to use 5 shades of gray, i can cut off any of the inkjets i don't need). i was just curious if there were any better options as i'm still having the same problem with the OEM inks, but can achieve the same "tone" as using MIS inks. it is slightly less smooth in the highlights (but on the wall you'd never know). i can't speak for the longevity of the prints relative to ones done with the MIS inks. do you see at this point in time, any better options than the above mixture i listed to eliminate that awful magenta cast? would the Ultratone FS (not the neutral version) be a more viable option on Semi-Gloss/Luster? i haven't tried those yet. thanks for the help, it's always appreciated
Message
Re: [Digital BW] question for paul/print that doesn't have a magenta tone
2005-01-18 by evanj1969
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.