OK, so say i wanted to set up my 2200 with grays, FSN specially, and leave IJC out of the equation for the moment and use Photoshop. i'd be printing ONLY on EPSG,EPL,EPSM and i want the least amount of green and magenta (a neutral balance of the two i guess) how would i configure my ink slots? all Ultratones..... Pk .. Lk (Custom Light Black) what is that? .. FSN-C .. FSN-M .. FSN- C .. FSN-M and THEN that actual Light Cyan (used as a cooler) to tone down the magnet, or would it to tone down the green?? >The UT-FSN uses the new blue and avoid M entirely, making it a more stable ink. are you saying that i shouldn't get the magenta undertone with the latest UT FSN inks? sorry paul, i'm just a bit confused evan " <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > You've probably hit the main options here. The UT-FSN inks with a Light > cyan, or just the carbon inks with LC, LM, & IJC. One advantage of using > the UT-FSN + LC instead of the FS + LC & LM, is that you avoid the M. The > UT-FSN uses the new blue and avoid M entirely, making it a more stable ink. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > Among the neutral-cool dark gray inks, FSN-C is the least magenta > cast. > > (There is none of the old magenta in these mixes, and I hate to say > it's > > "green.") It has the same ratio of color pigments as the UT7 LK- N. > > > > If you were into mixing inks, you could use these to mix the other > grays. > > > > On the other hand, you might find that one of these in a printer > might give > > you the control you need. > > > are you referring to Ultratone FSN-C? > > the CLOSEST i have gotten to eliminating that magenta cast was using > the following in my 1280....(all ultratone inks) > Pk, FSN-C, FSN-M, FSN-C, EZN, & MIS GP Archival Light Cyan (actual > light cyan). this gave me a coolish print, with still a "hit" of > magenta/coolish tone in the darker areas. for some subjects, it was > quite pleasing, but if prefer just a neutral print every day. > > right now i've switched to the 2200, and also have IJC.(so i > wouldn't HAVE to use 5 shades of gray, i can cut off any of the > inkjets i don't need). i was just curious if there were any better > options as i'm still having the same problem with the OEM inks, but > can achieve the same "tone" as using MIS inks. it is slightly less > smooth in the highlights (but on the wall you'd never know). i can't > speak for the longevity of the prints relative to ones done with the > MIS inks. > > do you see at this point in time, any better options than the above > mixture i listed to eliminate that awful magenta cast? > would the Ultratone FS (not the neutral version) be a more viable > option on Semi-Gloss/Luster? i haven't tried those yet. > > thanks for the help, it's always appreciated > > >
Message
Re: question for paul/print that doesn't have a magenta tone
2005-01-19 by evanj1969
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.