With my 2100 UT-FSN-C only yields a dMax of 1.67 on EPSG, whereas MIS PK gets me to 2.0 (using QTR and no overlaps and 90% ink limit - I find QTR's dither breaks down at 100% and there is little dMax diff between 95 and 90% ink limits). > From: Paul Roark <paul.roark@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:46:17 -0800 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re: Glop, 1280, Epson driver, and QTR ;) > > > Bruce, > >> My bottles of the old style MIS FS inks are running out on my 1160. > >> I am becoming intrigued by the idea of replacing them with a >> tri-tone inkset and GLOP. > >> Paul, or anyone else, would you have a suggestion as to which inks I >> might load so that I can print with a black and two grey inks? The idea >> is that I would be able to print on matte paper as well as glossy using >> the GLOP. I know I may be sacrificing a little dottiness in the >> highlights with the 3 ink approach, but I think I may still be happy >> with it. > >> I'll make my own QTR curves so it doesn't have to be a "standard" >> combination of inks. I do like the color of the original FS inkset. > > You might consider the UT-FSN-C and UT-FSN-M. The 1160 has a modern > variable dot on the color jets. So, you don't need the FSN-Y anyway. The > Glop could then go in that spot. The UT-FSN-C can generate a reasonably > good dmax on glossy paper. > > Let us know how it works if you go this way. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Glop, 1280, Epson driver, and QTR ;)
2005-01-19 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.