Yes, thanks, Tony, you did answer my question, and I appreciate it. I'm thinking about trying to use the R800 or its big brother for matte prints. -- Sam At 3:44 PM +0000 1/20/05, Tony Bonanno wrote: >Hi Sam, > >I was using luster/semi-gloss I believe when I was experimenting >with B&W out of the 800. Sometimes it seemed pretty good with very >little color cast, other times noticed a slight green cast that I >could tweak out with a curve. I haven't attempted to use the 800 >for quite awhile for any B&W, but as I recall the output on matte >was pretty good. Not sure if this answered your question Sam ? >What I like about QTR, is it just seems to work so darn well with >minimal experimenting, no matter what paper I use. > >Cheers, > >Tony > >--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Sam McCandless ><samcc@v...> wrote: >> At 4:21 PM +0000 1/19/05, Tony Bonanno wrote: >> I've not been able to get good B&W quality >> >out of the 800 consistently. [snip] >> >> On matte, glossy, or both Tony? On is it more complex than that? >Thanks. >> -- >> Sam
Message
[Digital BW] Re: R800 and B&W
2005-01-21 by Sam McCandless
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.