Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: mac vs PC

2005-01-22 by Anthony G. Atkielski

Jos\ufffd Miguel Ferreira writes:

> For 7 years I worked as a Macintosh specialist. I sold, installed,
> configured and trouble-shooted Macs and Mac networks. Most of my customers
> were architects, designers, photographers, the usual crowd...
> I stopped my business just before Mac OS X came out, so I can't speak for
> that...

Mac OS X is a completely different OS, though ... a dramatic change that
resembles the preceding OS only superficially.  It's very much like the
change between the older versions of Windows and Windows NT/XP/200x.

Both OS X and the NT-based Windows operating systems belong to a new
generation of operating systems that are inherently very stable.  Any of
them should be able to run continuously for years without a boot or
crash (some of mine have).

The old Mac OS was garbage ... it belonged to the same generation as
16-bit Windows 3.1, and had the same defects.  It's amazing how long Mac
users put up with it.  OS X is probably not ideal for a desktop (the
UNIX foundation of the OS is a timesharing server operating system, not
a desktop operating system), but it's a dramatic improvement over its
predecessor.

Similarly, XP/NT/200x are dramatic improvements over their predecessors,
but it's not clear exactly what they want to be.  NT was designed as a
server, like UNIX, but Microsoft has pushed the operating systems more
and more towards a desktop architecture, making them prettier and more
friendly but also less secure, stable, and flexible.  The move towards a
desktop GUI does this to any operating system; it has the same effect on
OS X, which is less stable than a pure UNIX system.  Even a UNIX system
running a GUI like X Server is less stable and secure than a straight
UNIX server configuration.

> I now use one Windows XP machine for everything. It never crashes,
> maintenance is minimal. At equal computing performances, it costs
> *way* less than a Mac.

I can't speak for costs, but all three of my machines (XP, NT, and
FreeBSD) will run indefinitely without a crash.  I don't believe I've
ever seen XP crash.  I've seen my NT system crash a few times when I
tried to install buggy drivers.  I've seen FreeBSD crash for the same
reason.  Hardware problems can crash any system, of course.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.