Hi John. The 3000 is exactly what I did and I don't in the least regret it. It's a fine machine despite being nearly as long in the tooth as I am. I thought, because of talk, that it wasn't up to par quality wise due to larger dots but I found it not to be a problem for larger prints. Particularly so with Quad printing but even with color pigs where I expected it to be a dog. I think it fine for 11x14 and up going on the wall. You will find it is great for experimenting with mixes because you can very easily empty/flush/fill cartridges for it and Mis has new inexpensive emptys available as well as cheap dye carts you can also flush and use. Mine has never clogged, period, which I certainly can't say about my 1200s. That said, you need to pay some attention to what you are going to be mixing in the machine and cartridges.ie: NEVER mix UTs, UCs, any Eboni or like later inks with any residues of inks with ANY dye content. I haven't tried forcing 300gm heavy papers through it but have no problems with the 200-240 range. There are others who found ways to do so and some who never could get 300 to work no matter what they did. In my estimation it is a good way to go for what you want to do. Also a bonus of larger print capability--and--in the $300 or so range as opposed to $2000 or so w/inks etc for an EP4000. Hope this is helpfull. Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "mojojones2001" <mojojones@c...> wrote: > > > Hello All, > > This is my first post to this group. (I've got a lot of questions but > I'll try to start off slow!) > > I've been printing for several years with a couple Epson 1200's; one > set up with Generations Archival color inks and one set up with > PiezoTone with generally good results. However I'm looking to branch > out and do some experimenting with other inks, workflows, custom > mixing, etc. After looking at some of the option's it seems that > there aren't as many options for the 1200's as other printers so I'm > looking for another way to go. I looked at maybe going with a 1280 or > 2200 (though it seems a waste to use a 2200 for messing around). Then > I saw that 3000's were going fairly cheap on ebay. There seems to be > considerable workflow/RIP support for them and they have individual > carts for switching inks, but they are quite long in the tooth at this > point. I remember that some time back there was a lot of talk about > poor paper handling and clogging so I was wonder what you all thought > about them now and recommendations on whether it would be worth the > setup in light of more modern printers. > > Thanks for your help, > > John
Message
Re: Epson 3000 opinions?
2005-01-22 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.