I'm simply using the canned Epson glossy profile. Not perfect, but very good tonally and quite attractive. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveabrink" <steveabrink@y...> wrote: > > Djon, thanks much for the info. -- I'm going to try some... > > Can you please tell me what QTR profile your using or is this a > custom profile...? > > SteveB > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon" > <westsidemaurice@y...> wrote: > > > > Little bronzing, none under most light. If you work at it you can > see it. > > > > There is an etched-seeming effect on the surface, at the edges of > deep > > blacks, analogous almost to the famous "Rodinal Effect" ... that's > > where bronzing can be seen if you hold the print at an angle under > > certain (unusual) kinds of light. I can see it if I hold the print > > close to an Ott light (neo daylight) at about 45deg. I've not found > > other situations but they probably exist. No evidence of it under > > tungsten, open soft daylight, harsh daylight, or warm fluorescent. > > Might be a problem under spots, such as decor or certain exhibit > > lighting. > > > > I don't think glossy's ever been the ideal for photos under glass, > so > > if the print's supposed to be hung I'll use a matte. > > > > Kokopelli is better-looking than Kodak's RC silver paper ever was, > > even with the bronzing. Better blacks, better scale, better gloss. > > > > Kokopelli isn't as satisfactory for color, but Photoshop User says > > it's the best, fwiw. I'm using Moab Entrada Natural for color, a > matte > > paper without whiteners. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveabrink" > > <steveabrink@y...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > For the Moab glossy paper are you using the IsmoothPearl profile > or a > > > custom profile? > > > > > > How's the bronzing? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > SteveB > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Djon" > > > <westsidemaurice@y...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > QTRgui does a fabulous job (easy as pie, zero glitches) with > inkjet > > > > B&W (2200 and OEM pigments) but I've not figured out how to > specify > > > > image size on a print, or how to locate a print accurately on a > page > > > > (which we can do with some awkwardness using the Epson printer > app). > > > > > > > > For example, I'd like to make 6X9 on 8.5X11 and I CAN do that > with > > > the > > > > Epson printer app, but I can't do that with QTR...which is near > > > > perfect, for B&W. Grrrr. > > > > > > > > Any ideas out there? > > > > > > > > Plug: Moab Kokopelli and the standard Epson pigments produce > VERY > > > > attractive and subtle selenium-toned look, superb blacks, and an > > > > excellent high gloss in B&W... > > > > > > > > I wish color was as satisfactory gloss-wise... a report in the > > > current > > > > Photoshop User Magazine rates Kokopelli as the very best glossy > > > paper > > > > in all but one test image, but it still looks like glossy > color's > > > > further from perfect than is QTR B&W glossy.
Message
Re: QTR and Kokopelli glossy...
2005-01-24 by Djon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.