Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Piezography? Or, the state of the state.

2005-01-28 by Moises Faidengold

Shilesh,
 
Interesting comments you make.
Now, let me be a little blunt. I have been playing with a 220o and the Epson inks and so far have not been able to get really dark blacks therefore I really would appreciate your input and/or suggestions as to what to do.
I also, tried with the QTR, but so far I have not fully satisfied with it.
And I really would like to keep having the capacity to print color with the 2200 therefore the route of the OEM inks is somewhat inconvenient. I have however a 1280 that I could convert to be a B&W only, any suggestions?
 
Regards
 
Moises

Shilesh Jani <shilesh.jani@...> wrote:

Jeff,

Here is what I would do.

(1) get the 4000 if 17 inch is wide enough for you.
(2) install and use QTR
(3) if you like it, send Roy the $50
(4) enjoy making prints

If you don't like QTR, that's when life gets complicated.  You have 
choice of:

(1) continuing with OEM inks + RIP.  This will not necessarily be 
better than QTR, or
(2) putting-in 3rd party gary inks such as offered by MIS and Cone.

In my mind (and experience), there is no doubt that the best output 
will come from 3rd party gray inks.  But the difference will be so 
miniscule, that you will wonder why you went down that path, in the 
process losing the ability to make color prints.  Only a year ago I 
would have recomended to go with 3rd party inks and get a separate 
printer for color (if that is an interest for you).  Not anymore.  
For $50 QTR is an embarrasing bargain.  Oh, I have made and seen some 
very compelling b/w prints from the 2200, 4000, and 7600 printers 
with just the Epson driver, provided you have a good profile for your 
paper, and you are not too finicky about metamerism.  The same cannot 
be said for the older generation 1280 dye based inkset.

Good luck.

Shilesh

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Curto 
<jeff@j...> wrote:
> 
> The collective wisdom of this group is phenomenal, so I'm looking 
for some
> opinions.
> 
> Once upon a time, I used Cone's Piezography Photoshop plug-in in 
combination
> with his inks on an Epson 1200 to make beautiful prints. Problem 
was, for
> every beautiful print I made, I made 20 that were "tossers" because 
of ink
> clogs, banding issues, etc, etc, etc.
> 
> I gave up.
> 
> Recently, I've been using QTR on an Epson 2200 (thanks, Roy!), and 
I'm
> impressed, mainly because it works on a nearly "plug-and-play" sort 
of
> fashion. I'd like a bit more richness in the blacks, but otherwise, 
I'm
> happy.
> 
> I also note that a number of users on this list are using Paul 
Roark's
> curves, and still others are using ImagePrint to drive various 
printers.
> 
> I am also on a Piezography listserv, and note that the number of 
messages in
> that group has tailed off to nearly "zero" over the last few months,
> suggesting that either users are busy making prints, or that, like 
me,
> they've abandoned ship, looking for a lower frustration 
and "P.I.A." factor.
> 
> I'm considering buying an Epson 4000 for use with either QTR or 
ImagePrint,
> and before I make that large (size and price) leap, I'm seeking 
opinions on
> the state of B&W inkjet printing at this point in history.
> 
> *Is Piezography dead?
> *Is the Epson 4000 worth the price of admission?
> *Is ImagePrint superior to Roy's QTR? If so, why or how?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any insights that anyone might have.
> 
> -Jeff Curto





Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
- Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
- By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.




---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

   To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
  
   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  
   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.