Thanks - using "maximum" is much better. Image size is right and it is centred (+/- 1mm) > From: Steve Kale <stevekale@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:47:19 +0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Print Margins, Print Sizes - QTR vs Epson 2100 > driver > > > Phil > > Does it print the 4x6 a little big or does it stay 4x6 and trim the edge of > the image? I just had a long discussion with Epson UK Support. They simply > did not believe me, did not have a 2100 they could use to test and asked me > to send in the tests I had done. They were also unaware of the photo black > Black Only issue - printing with all colours. > > I gess I will check out the "maximum" option for the 2100. (There are > Standard, Maximum and No Margins.) Maybe that is the equivalent of > "minimize margins". > > Steve > > >> From: Phil Rose <pjrose@...> > >> >> The 2200 Epson prints perfectly centered images--without any excluded >> top/bottom segments-- if the driver version called "Stylus Photo 2200 >> (Standard--Minimize Margins)" is used. This driver version is not to >> be confused with the one used for borderless printing (that's called >> "no margins" for the 2100?), which Epson calls "Stylus Photo 2200 >> (Sheet Feeder--Borderless)". Yes, the 2200 borderless option does >> print with somewhat expanded image size--something Epson does in order >> to help ensure that the print will actually be borderless. IMHO, >> Epson goes too far in this regard (I print a 4x6" image scaled down to >> 3.85x5.775 in order to minimize the amount that the driver "trims" off >> my image. >> >> Phil
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Print Margins, Print Sizes - QTR vs Epson 2100 driver
2005-02-02 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.